There are many different ways to approach an analysis paper.
One of these ways is just talking about your process of analyzing a paper, and
or talking about your analysis in general. Another is that the analysis itself
is usually the bulk of a paper, which is also doubled as the evidence to
support the point you were trying to make in the beginning. What are the
motivations behind your analysis, and what is the context that made you believe
what you did. We learned more about the idea of using the how you feel to get a
better impact, especially since your audience is similar or exactly opposite of
your stance as your beliefs will be more powerful. We learned a lot about
counter arguments and better ways to write/ understand them. When we are given
topics that we dislike, it’s hard sometimes to find the point you’re supposed
to defend, and it’s easier at times to find the counter argument and work from
there.
No comments:
Post a Comment